Dec3 593 to go … 592 to go … 591 to go … Posted on December 3, 2012 by rthepotter Standard Or the summary version: here we go again …. About these ads
Beautiful, so delicate. I’m intrigued why you started at 593, or if you didn’t, why you started at an even larger number? Reply ↓
I started at about 680 because that is the biggest number I can bear to start at. If I thought of a number starting with seven hundred and something I would never start at all. Reply ↓
How beautiful! But why so very many?
Because one snowflake doesn’t make a blizzard
Oh. Kay.
680 don’t make a blizzard either, to tell the truth, but it gets quite a lot closer.
Beautiful, so delicate. I’m intrigued why you started at 593, or if you didn’t, why you started at an even larger number?
I started at about 680 because that is the biggest number I can bear to start at. If I thought of a number starting with seven hundred and something I would never start at all.